1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Super Wasp has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
Make | Hudson | Smart |
Model | Super Wasp | Ultimate 112 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1570 mm |