1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 306 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 SsangYong Musso. (306 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Hudson | SsangYong |
| Model | Super Wasp | Musso |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |
