1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2009 BMW Z4

To start off, 2009 BMW Z4 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW Z4 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 237 kg more than 2009 BMW Z4.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW Z4. (250 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW Z4. 2009 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Super Wasp has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Hudson Super Wasp 2009 BMW Z4
Make Hudson BMW
Model Super Wasp Z4
Year Released 1953 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4293 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 349 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.5 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 78.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1599 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 4100 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1310 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]