1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2009 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Super Wasp has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: