1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 547 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2009 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Hudson | Nissan |
| Model | Super Wasp | Note |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2600 mm |
