1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2010 BMW 323
To start off, 2010 BMW 323 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 323 (175 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 323. (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2010 BMW 323 | |
Make | Hudson | BMW |
Model | Super Wasp | 323 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |