1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Hudson | Citroen |
| Model | Super Wasp | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
