1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Hudson | Aston Martin |
Model | Super Wasp | Cygnet |
Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |