1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (190 Nm). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Hudson | Chevrolet |
Model | Super Wasp | Aveo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 349 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 46 L |