1953 Humber Pullman vs. 1972 Saab 99
To start off, 1972 Saab 99 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Pullman (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1972 Saab 99. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1972 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 990 kg more than 1972 Saab 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Saab 99. (167 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 1972 Saab 99 | |
| Make | Humber | Saab |
| Model | Pullman | 99 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |
