1953 Humber Pullman vs. 1990 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1990 Toyota MR2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Toyota MR2 (135 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 965 kg more than 1990 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Toyota MR2. (196 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 1990 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Humber | Toyota |
| Model | Pullman | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
