1953 Humber Pullman vs. 1993 Lada Niva
To start off, 1993 Lada Niva is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Pullman (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1993 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1993 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 988 kg more than 1993 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 1993 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Humber | Lada |
| Model | Pullman | Niva |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1452 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |
