1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 2 kg more than 1953 Humber Pullman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Humber Pullman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Humber Pullman. (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Humber Pullman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Pullman | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |
