1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 376 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Humber Pullman. (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Humber Pullman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Humber | Jeep |
| Model | Pullman | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1764 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 78 L |
