1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Pullman (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1060 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Pullman | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Humber | Mazda |
Model | Pullman | 2 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |