1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 934 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Humber | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Pullman | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 42 L |
