1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Humber | Ford |
| Model | Pullman | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 143 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2490 mm |
