1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Pullman (116 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 981 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Pullman | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Humber | Citroen |
Model | Pullman | C3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 286 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |