1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2010 Ford F-250

To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1953 Humber Pullman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Humber Pullman. (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Humber Pullman.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Humber Pullman 2010 Ford F-250
Make Humber Ford
Model Pullman F-250
Year Released 1953 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4138 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 116 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 286 Nm 494 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3750 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 2140 kg 2805 kg
Vehicle Length 5290 mm 6253 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 2029 mm
Vehicle Height 1770 mm 1961 mm
Wheelbase Size 3330 mm 3967 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 115 L