1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2010 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2010 Mercury Milan is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 449 kg more than 2010 Mercury Milan.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Milan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2010 Mercury Milan | |
| Make | Humber | Mercury |
| Model | Pullman | Milan |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1691 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4801 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |
