1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 531 kg more than 2010 Volvo S80.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo S80. (240 Nm). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Pullman | S80 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 67 L |
