1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2011 Citroen C4
To start off, 2011 Citroen C4 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Citroen C4 (181 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4 should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 803 kg more than 2011 Citroen C4.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen C4. (180 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen C4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2011 Citroen C4 | |
| Make | Humber | Citroen |
| Model | Pullman | C4 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 181 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1337 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
