1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 590 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Humber Pullman (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mitsubishi Colt. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1953 Humber Pullman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Pullman | 2011 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Humber | Mitsubishi |
Model | Pullman | Colt |
Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 286 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9:01 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 47 L |