1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 531 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Pullman | S60 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1609 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 67 L |
