1953 Humber Pullman vs. 2013 Lincoln MKT
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKT is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKT (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1953 Humber Pullman. (116 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKT should accelerate faster than 1953 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Pullman weights approximately 7 kg more than 2013 Lincoln MKT.
Because 1953 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKT (376 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Humber Pullman. (286 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Humber Pullman.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Humber Pullman | 2013 Lincoln MKT | |
| Make | Humber | Lincoln |
| Model | Pullman | MKT |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 286 Nm | 376 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5273 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2995 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
