1953 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1966 Lotus Elan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1194 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Super Snipe | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Humber | Lotus |
Model | Super Snipe | Elan |
Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |