1953 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1967 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 1967 Reliant Rebel is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 1967 Reliant Rebel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 1280 kg more than 1967 Reliant Rebel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Super Snipe | 1967 Reliant Rebel | |
Make | Humber | Reliant |
Model | Super Snipe | Rebel |
Year Released | 1953 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |