1953 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Neon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Humber Super Snipe (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Humber Super Snipe should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Because 1953 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Plymouth Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Humber Super Snipe | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Humber | Plymouth |
Model | Super Snipe | Neon |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4138 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2650 mm |