1953 Isuzu Minx vs. 1962 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1962 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Isuzu Bellel (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1953 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1953 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 370 kg more than 1953 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Isuzu Minx | 1962 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | Minx | Bellel |
Year Released | 1953 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |