1953 Isuzu Minx vs. 2005 Mazda 2
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 2 (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1953 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 2 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1953 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Isuzu Minx | 2005 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | 2 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2500 mm |