1953 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Matrix (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1953 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1953 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 1621 kg more than 1953 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Isuzu Minx | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | Minx | Matrix |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2581 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |