1953 Jaguar C-Type vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 195 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar C-Type | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | C-Type | Elan |
Year Released | 1953 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3440 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |