1953 Jaguar C-Type vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1953 Jaguar C-Type has manual transmission. 1953 Jaguar C-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar C-Type | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | C-Type | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3440 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2710 mm |