1953 Jaguar C-Type vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1953 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar C-Type | 2012 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | C-Type | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3440 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |