1953 Jaguar C-Type vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.
Because 1953 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Accord (350 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. (330 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Jaguar C-Type | 2012 Honda Accord | |
| Make | Jaguar | Honda |
| Model | C-Type | Accord |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3440 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
