1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XK | XC90 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |