1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 156
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,177 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 | |
Make | Jaguar | Alfa Romeo |
Model | XK | 156 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3177 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 63 L |