1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar XK (291 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Jaguar | Proton |
Model | XK | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2610 mm |