1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher.
Because 1953 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XK | C30 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |