1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 BMW X5
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2012 BMW X5 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | XK | X5 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4857 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1776 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 85 L |