1953 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Scion tC
To start off, 2012 Scion tC is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Scion tC (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1953 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1953 Jaguar XK.
Because 1953 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar XK (291 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Scion tC. (234 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jaguar XK | 2012 Scion tC | |
Make | Jaguar | Scion |
Model | XK | tC |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |