1953 Jeep CJ vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1954 Riley RM A is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Riley RM A weights approximately 119 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Jeep | Riley |
Model | CJ | RM A |
Year Released | 1953 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |