1953 Jeep CJ vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR2 (127 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 131 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota MR2 (176 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Jeep CJ | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | CJ | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2460 mm |
