1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 (355 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 18 kg more than 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 492 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | R 390 GT1 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 637 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1098 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2730 mm |