1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 644 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Jeep CJ 2003 Nissan X-Trail
Make Jeep Nissan
Model CJ X-Trail
Year Released 1953 2003
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2199 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1116 kg 1760 kg
Wheelbase Size 2040 mm 2540 mm