1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ | XC90 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2870 mm |