1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 31 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ | 3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2650 mm |