1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 169 kg more than 1953 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |