1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2008 Nissan Altima
To start off, 2008 Nissan Altima is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Altima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Altima (159 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Altima should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Nissan Altima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Altima (220 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Altima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Jeep CJ | 2008 Nissan Altima | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | CJ | Altima |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2780 mm |