1953 Jeep CJ vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1953 Jeep CJ. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Jeep CJ | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Jeep | Holden |
| Model | CJ | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2685 mm |
